Heidi, once again
Not to open up old wounds, but this is of interest.The noteworthy blog MONSTER MAGAZINE WORLD posted these a week ago. In very tiny size on the blog, so you can't read the captions or the text. I...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
Ted Newsom wrote: ... take Arthur C. Clarke, the living legend from Ceylon, the Amphibian God: take one look at those pictures of Him and Heidi and you can't help but wonder if (stand in line) he...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
Yeah, it's pretty incredible. Again, before seeing the entire magazine, I had heard that the contents weren't much of anything. Now those comments seem like nothing but a cop hurrying a crowd along...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
I thought Clarke was primarily interested in little boys? We must keep up pretense in public, lest we add an unwholesome attribute to the ambiance.
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
Jojo Lapin X wrote:Ted Newsom wrote: ... take Arthur C. Clarke, the living legend from Ceylon, the Amphibian God: take one look at those pictures of Him and Heidi and you can't help but wonder if...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
Latarnia wrote: Yes, he was. But did Forry know?I think he was trying to cover up for Clarke. It is only from our current cultural perspective that the effort looks misguided.It is not really very...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
Ted Newsom wrote: Lest anyone think this is all in good, old-fashioned innocence and not grossly inappropriate sexual objectification: As a New Year's gift to the world, her parents brought Aquarius...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
I post this link here only because the Internet too often accepts as fact things that are far more complex: Clarke controversy .That link has a whole other viewpoint, and one which is actually the...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
Clarke, although given ample opportunity, never denied being interested in little boys. When he last had sex with one, if ever, is, of course, an entirely different issue.
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
'Never denied' is a pretty thin reed to condemn someone's life with.But whatever. Just wanted the complete story to be available here.
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
It's a murky area, trying to explore someone's sex life and interests-- especially without their cooperation. All you can do is observe and document. From there on, it's rational thinking along...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
>>The Clarke quotes in the article have what my old editor called "the air of versimilitude." There is a casual, offhand nature to them, as though it was simply a couple friends chatting... I...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
they felt so too-good-to-be-true perfect that I doubted them immediately. -- my feeling exactly about the output of Boze Hadleigh, David! (Though I do want his Nancy Kulp interview to be legit. I...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
Not saying the charges are true, but....http://findarticles.com/p...s_19980208/ai_n14474575/Eventually, someone will write a book or an in-depth article on the matter.Mirek
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
>>Would you run with that story as the writer if you knew you could not back it up? And you're an editor: would you OK a story like that without grilling the writer about his sources and...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
Ted Newsom wrote: -- my feeling exactly about the output of Boze Hadleigh, David! (Though I do want his Nancy Kulp interview to be legit.)Would you please elaborate on this?
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
I liked the Nancy Kulp interview, and it "sounded" like what I would imagine Nancy Kulp would say. The incidents she/Hadleigh/whomever relate dovetail nicely with demonsterable fact. But in general,...
View ArticleRe: Heidi, once again
I am gouing to re read CHILDHOOD'S END....I think I might have missed something there the first go around
View Article
